Buy custom White Collar Assignment essay

The state and federal agencies charged with regulation are the Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, US Postal Inspection Service, US Secret Service, US Marshals Service and the Internal Revenue Service Investigation Division. They are all charged with investigation into white collar crimes and the enforcement of laws governing white collar crimes

Discuss the strengths and weakness of the current efforts to create and enforce those regulations

Strengths in the efforts to enforce the regulations are the vast resources available to the enforcing authorities. There is also inter-agency cooperation that makes enforcement easy due to the large jurisdictions covered. Also the inter-agency cooperation encourages sharing of resource database hence increasing the effectiveness of the enforcing authorities.

The weakness include the under enforcement of the regulations especially due to limiting laws, for example laws on individual rights.  The “catch up” approach of government agencies that compromises the enforcement as the agencies lag behind on current information about the industry.

What roles does the criminal justice system play in the control of white collar crime?

The role of the justice system is to sentence the white collar offender according to the laid down laws and procedures. The justice system also sanctions and fines on corporations involved in white collar crime.

The justice system has been effective in curbing white collar crimes; however, there have been recent increases in the crime probably due to the prevailing economic meltdown.

Compare and contrast the case of the antitrust violations in the petroleum industry with the case of Michael Milken

The Sherman Antitrust law of 1890 was enacted to combat to anticompetitive practices, reduce market domination by individual corporations, and preserve unfettered competition as the rule of trade. Michael Milken was implicated in insider trading while most of the antitrust violations in the petroleum industry range from price fixing and excusive dealing agreements. However, both sets of violations are anticompetitive as Milken’s stock parking and stock manipulation discouraged competition.

What are the reasons that the promise of equal justice for street offenders and white collar offenders so often fails to come true?

The ideal of equal justices between white collar and street offenders is a sham According to Reinman, the public tends to be indifferent to business crime or even to sympathize with the offenders who have been caught”.

 The white collar offenders unlike street offenders occupy respected positions in society and often work in powerful companies hence one of the reason for the inequality.

White collar crimes most of the times are intermingled with legitimate economic conduct posing difficulty in prosecuting of such crimes unlike the street offenders.

Do you agree with the way corporate violence is defined in this chapter?

Yes, David Friedrichs has argued that corporate violence is different from other forms of interpersonal violence in at least four distinct ways.  Corporate violence is indirect in that one person is not directly assaulting another; second, corporate violence, by its very nature, is collective; third, the effects of corporate violence are usually difficult to link to the policy or policies that created them; fourth, corporate violence is motivated by a desire to maximize profits while reducing costs. All the above should be rightly considered corporate violence as they may be directly or indirectly associated with harmful or social injury.

Which occupational crime do you consider most serious, and why?

Crimes of professionals since it not only leads to exploitation of the client but in some cases may lead to grave harm to the client, for example, white collar crime by medical professionals.

Which state crime do you consider the most serious one, and why?

War crimes is the most serious as it causes gross harm to the citizens with little or no way of keeping it in check.

Of all the forms of finance crimes discussed, which do you consider the most serious, and why?

Securities fraud as it induces investors to make transactions on the basis of inaccurate information hence may be responsible for large financial losses. It can also include theft from investors.

Of all forms of Contrepreneurial crime discussed, which do you consider the most serious, and why?

Scams that pose as legitimate businesses; this may mislead investors into making investment in nonexistent businesses with resultant loss of money invested.

How should contrepreneurial crime be punished?

Like other forms of white collar crimes, contrepreneurial crimes should be punished with fines, compensations and jail time where need be.

Questions

  1. Marx and Engels accused capitalist corporations of all but which of the following? Willful homicide of workers
  2. A combination of centrally owned firms operating in different fields is known as a Conglomerate
  3. In 1993, Wal-Mart was found guilty of “predatory pricing,” which is: pricing certain items below cost to destroy smaller competitors
  4. Illegal activities associated with small retail businesses are likely to include all but which of the following? Evasion of sales taxes
  5. Which of the following terms applies to illegal activities carried out by officials and politicians for direct personal gain? Political white collar crime
  6. Governmental crime, as distinct from the traditional notion of political crime, is exemplified by: state-agency illegal surveillance
  7. State-corporate crime is characterized as a _____ form of white collar crime. Hybrid
  8. The term “finance crime” is used in this text to refer to a(n): large-scale illegality which occurs in the world of finance
  9. Which of the pairs below is a match? Enterprise crime/organized crime
  10. Which of the following criminal activities has the Mafia not been traditionally associated with? Check-kiting

Buy custom White Collar Assignment essay

Related essays

  1. The Law of Defamation
  2. Megan Kanka’s Case
  3. Criminal Defense